The public service announcements will be in the public
interest. But when wealthy Hollywood celebrities build them, it's about
advancing their left-wing agenda — everything from targeting President Donald
Trump to supporting an anti-Christian anti-conservative hate group.
The new PSA features celebrities urging the Southern Poverty
Law Center (SPLC) to donate. On August 26, it aired on CBS, starring 7
celebrities from sports, movies, and television. This video was made by the
19th PSA celebrity in the past 14 months.
Although the videos differ in subject matter, they share one
thing in common — they show wealthy stars telling us how to live. The stars of
the 19 PSAs are worth a $11.5 billion aggregate, or approximately the entire
Nebraska state budget — with a population of 1.9 million.
According to Celeb Net Worth, only the 7 on the SPLC ad
are worth a whopping $526,000,000. But they want to tell viewers where they can
make a donation.
That's not the only celebrity PSA celebrating the agenda of
the left, which by the way contains both hate and prejudice against the
conservative movement. Between 22 June 2016 and 26 August 2017, there were 19
PSAs published by 14 charitable organizations (and 5 random celebrity
movements). Those featured about 273 celebrities, or just a shit ton of famous
people in the words of actress Julianne Moore. The networth of that
better-than-the-rest-of-us throng of stars is around $11.487.150,000. That's
quite a hefty public awareness / charity bill.
Or is it really charity? Of the 19 recordings, 7 were
released in an effort to stop Donald Trump's presidential election or an effort
to get him impeached. This included the viral video Save the Day by Joss Whedon
starring 28 celebrities, as well as Unite For America by Martin Sheen. They
were also using a PSA (7 of them!) to warn the public not to vote for or help
Trump, or as Don Cheadle called him, a racist, violent coward who could
permanently destroy our society's fabric.
Although one election video had the decency to actually urge
Americans to vote, the other election videos specifically targeted Trump
irrespective of who they voted for. There was also a video titled Women CanHinder Trump with Amber Tamblyn (because of course). In reality, Singer Beyonce
made a video specifically endorsing and campaigning for Hillary Clinton
alongside her boyfriend, rapper Jay-Z, and several other music stars.
Not to mention the wild, flabbergasted, furious emotions of
the video Art Not War addressed to Dear Congressmen. And nothing shouts class
like the TV-star of Rachel Bloom studded musical Holy Sh*t You Have to Vote
PSA, in which she contrasted Trump's vote to elect a tyrant to power in Germany
after the First World War. Overall, 104 celebrities dedicated their time and
resources to make the PSAs movement pro-Hillary.
Lena Dunham's Lenny Letter PSA was created on its own in
support of Planned Parenthood and Planned Parenthood. Similar PSAs did not
urging people to adopt minority children. And the # EmbraceAmbition from ToryBurch was meant to mark International Women's Day. Obviously, in March 2017
Tina Fey and Alec Baldwin called for funding from the ACLU.
On 10 August 2017, Al Gore released a PSA for his global
warming push. They called it # BeInconvenient. The overall net worth for the
celebrities who have pledged their allegiance to the cause of climate change?
1.75 Billion Dollars. According to Celebrity Net Worth, al Gore alone is worth
$300 million.
Pursuant to a PSA's dictionary definition: an announcement
made for the public's benefit. Since watching 273 celebrities participating in
the past year in PSAs, how do all those leaders of the 1 percent have the
public's benefit in mind? (Hint: singing about how much you dislike orange
speaking STD on either hand won't encourage charitable sentiments.)
These PSAs
don't even describe the organizations that they support. In the SPLC PSA
scenario, viewers may learn more about how bad the SPLC actually is. The SPLC
is the agency which is fighting "hate groups." The infamous hate map
of the company led domestic terrorist Floyd Lee Corkins to the Family Research
Council, where he tried to shoot employees. The group has also attacked
mainstream groups such as ACT for America and the Alliance Protecting
Democracy. This comes on the heels of multi-million dollar contributions Apple,
JP Morgan and the Clooneys have already received from the SPLC.
But is
celebrity PSAs going to tell you that? No. With serious piano in the background
as Julianne Moore urges people to put an end to this nightmare, these PSAs are
doing nothing but divisive politics.
We can not say, to quote Martin Sheen, that both sides are
similarly unfavorable. Yes.-Yeah. One side is simply the one per cent of the
population crying on the television to try to get what they want, practically
at times. Or to quote Holy Shit You have Got to Vote. Faces that fade into
other faces told you so.
A more logical reason for the sheer number of celebrities
who put time and energy into PSAs may be that they use their money and power to
manipulate the votes of the people.
Where are all the stars who are donating or raising money
for real charities? These PSAs were not all bad. The best out of the series was
the British War Boy, where stars like Jude Law were thinking about giving
war-torn Syria to starving refugees. (These, needless to say, were not American
celebrities.)


Comments
Post a Comment